|
Reviews 1 - 1 (1 Reviews Total)
| |
Reviewed by: ggusta(Unregistered User)
Review Date May 6, 2006 Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for Less than 1 month
Shop for this product >>
|
|  |
Price Paid:
$20.00
at Nashbar Favorite Ride: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=76736 Bike Setup: 2004 Bianchi Imola, 105 all around, brooks saddle armadillo rear tire, Summary: Better than a camelbak and the entire pak (I have the 100 oz overflow) was less than my 70 ounce camelbak and is easier to clean. I love the bladder and I love the pack almost as much as the design of the bladder. No bladder is maintenance free but this is easier to clean than a camelbak. Camelbak hose is a pain to get clean and it will gro mildew if you aren't careful about cleaning a camelbak. Hydrapak hose is easier to clean. No mildew taste, plus it's clear instead of the blue camelbak which is a problem trying to visually inspect the bladder or the hose. Strengths: Cheap, easier to clean Weaknesses: No bladder is maintenance free. Can't someone invent lighter water??? Similar Products Used: Camebak 70 oz bladder 
|
|
 |