Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 1 (1 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
ggusta
a Recreational Rider
from Date Reviewed: May 6, 2006
Strengths: Cheap, easier to cleanWeaknesses: No bladder is maintenance free. Can't someone invent lighter water???Bottom Line: Better than a camelbak and the entire pak (I have the 100 oz overflow) was less than my 70 ounce camelbak and is easier to clean. I love the bladder and I love the pack almost as much as the design of the bladder. No bladder is maintenance free but this is easier to clean than a camelbak. Camelbak hose is a pain to get clean and it will gro mildew if you aren't careful about cleaning a camelbak. Hydrapak hose is easier to clean. No mildew taste, plus it's clear instead of the blue camelbak which is a problem trying to visually inspect the bladder or the hose.
Favorite Ride: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=76736
Price Paid:
$20.00
Purchased At: Nashbar
Similar Products Used: Camebak 70 oz bladder
Bike Setup: 2004 Bianchi Imola, 105 all around, brooks saddle armadillo rear tire,
|
Reviews 1 - 1 (1 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
