I have 1800 miles and have had no problems. I purchased new tires and a chain. Never had a flat. The bike has worked flawlessly. (Is that a word) this bike has minimal spokes and coast past any other bike. Great bike
wm of SF
Date Reviewed: March 9, 2012
Strengths: I ran over a deer on highway 84 in the Santa Cruz Mountains
"The Goat" has been some incredible number of thousands of miles and has provided an excellent bike for flying through the mountains. The only thing I recommend is to use Specialized Armadillo tires so you'll never get a flat. I ran over a deer on this bike and didn't crash. Excellent handling.
a Recreational Rider
Date Reviewed: February 29, 2012
Strengths: Great price for a bike with full Shimano 105 components- beats what comes on the 3.1 and 4.5 (brakes, wheels, and cranks).
Weaknesses: The aluminum frame doesn't have the coolness factor that the carbon frames do. However, if you nick or scratch the aluminum frame, you can sell it without a problem; I'm not sure you can say the same about a bike with a carbon frame.
I purchased a 2011 Trek 2.3 from Jax Bicycles about a month ago (January 2012) for $1340 OTD with a 3 year Red Shield protection plan. I sold a Trek Madone 4.5 last year, but missed road cycling, so within a few months I was looking for a replacement. I went back and forth between the 2.3 and 3.1 (the 4.5 was no longer in my price range) and decided on the 2.3 after I hung the 2.3 and 3.1 on a scale at the bike shop. Both bikes were 56cm and weighed the same (19.3 lbs without pedals). With pedals and two water bottle cages, my 2.3 weighs approximately 20.3 lbs. I threw on some "free" Race X lite wheels and got it down to 19.3 lbs. I am impressed with the ride quality and have not noticed the difference between the carbon and aluminum frames, even when riding with the stock wheels. I do, however, notice improved braking performance and feel with the 2.3 (105 brakes) over the 3.1 and 4.5 brakes. If you are looking to save weight by going with a carbon frame, you'll probably have to start shopping in the Madone 5-series, which will include better components, before you see a noticeable difference. Although, it is going to come with a much higher price tag.
Similar Products Used: Trek Madone 4.5
Gary Fisher HiFi Carbon (MTB)
Giant AC Air Lite (MTB)
Bike Setup: All stock, except the Race X Lite wheels
a Recreational Rider
Date Reviewed: July 25, 2011
Strengths: Light, strong, quick.
Weaknesses: While the carbon fork and stays soften the ride, it's not as comfortable a ride as my old steel bike. However, it's much more maneuverable and, of course, lighter.
This was a gift from my brother-in-law, who upgraded to a carbon bike. This has been a great bike for me -- 6'2", 250 -- as I work on getting back in shape. It's quick, comfortable, and strong. Not built for the Tour de France, but a great training/recreational bike for the above-average cyclist.
Weaknesses: compact gearing can spin out going downhill, standard seat, wheels and brakes not that great.
Trek 2.3, carbon stays, compact gearing, really has been a fantastic bike. Very stable, nice geometry, light and fast. Waited 2 yrs and 2K+ miles to review it. This is a great training bike. I have ridden a CAAD9 and this is similar, but w/a better ride.
Bike Setup: standard 105 components, upgraded no-name brakes to 105, upgraded wheels to Mavic Aksium, changed seat to Specialized BG Avatar, lots of Bontrager stuff. Bike rides great. Original Bontrager tires now have 2.5K miles on them, wearing very well.
Picked up a sweet 2011 trek alpha 2.3 from craigslist yesterday. It's been ridden about 300 miles so looks awesome. The only changes the owner told me he did was switching the seat and tires. Now that i have it home, i realize that the rims and hubs have no lettering whatsoever, so am w ... Read More »
The Trek Domane 2.3 is almost a perfect bike for light touring. My only complaint is there are no upgrade options relative to the 105 components.
Be great if you could also order the bike with the mid cage rd so you could install a 32T cassette for the mountains.
Why not provide customers the ... Read More »
With all the hassle involed with a triple and figuring that I would be quite happy with a 11-26 or 12-28 Compact Crankset I now intend to switch it.
What do I need?
Obviously the compact cranks, a double FD - but what more?
The only thing I know is that I propably can keep the shifters I just hav ... Read More »
I am new to biking and am interested in trying the sport. I am planning on riding around 50 miles per week, mostly for fitness. My price range is around $700, and I recently found a 2014 Fuji Sportif 2.3 for $650. I have a herniated C5 disc, so the bike needs to have more relaxed geometry like th ... Read More »
Hello all . . . . . my first post here. I have been riding an Oryx Racing 2200 for about 10 years now, which is an aluminum frame with CF front forks and Shimano 105. I have real problems with tendonitis in my arms and hands and want to upgrade to an overall better bike with better road dampening ab ... Read More »