Price Paid:
$0.00 Favorite Ride: irrelevant Bike Setup: one without reading lights. Summary: Since the departure of 'The old Pro remembers' segment,NOT the best bicyclemagazine out there. There are good articles to read, sure, good no excellent photography, BUT you will be reading 3 months of pre-TDF articles, 1 month of actual TDF coverage, and then another 3 months of @#$%TDF post-mortem articles. The product review articles are extremely superficial, and basically useless due to essential info often missing. (eg frame review will lack frame sizes available info). Lack of advertising means missing out on good websites to log on to, etc. If you are looking for a magazine that is the oposite to all the above and still British and still giving you excellent coverage and in depths info on major races try "Procycling". Similar cost, definitely a much more informative and varied rag, with product reviews by Robert Millar, Q and A to R. Millar, in short much better value. Strengths: photography, some articles, lack of advertising. Good coverage of 'life in the peloton' Weaknesses: productreviews are pathetic, too much TDF coverage (about 7 months of it), not enough info on website links. Similar Products Used: Many crappy australian magazines, unfortunately not worth spending $ on compared to CS or procycling
|