Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 1 (1 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
foxrace666
a Racer
from Hull, Québec, CanadaDate Reviewed: October 14, 2002
Strengths: - the display is easy to read
- not to expensiveWeaknesses: - not so preciced
- slow heart rate lecture frequence
- targets setting are not precised (scale of 5)
- bad for intervals training, it reads badly and pick's up your heart rates irrigularitiesBottom Line: It was my first heart monitor and I bought it because I didn't had alot of money for the big models. But the Pacer disapointed me and I'll have to buy a new one because the information it was giving me was not accurate (ex. it was giving me a lecture aprox. 10 reps higher than the one taken manualy or with an other device).
If you're training seriously, you should save a bit more your money and buy a better model from Polar, at the end it's going to be cheeper than buying an other one after a while just like I did.
The Pacer is made more for a week-end jogger type of user than a person that train seriously with his head.
Favorite Ride: Gatineau Park
Price Paid:
$80.00
Purchased At: some bike shop near
Similar Products Used: I tryed the vetta, Polar pro-tarinner XT
and I just bought the Polar S-610 and it's great!, precided and very usedfull
Bike Setup: Eclipse (ance-6 alu.), shimano 105/ultegra, ritchey WCS stem, Italia flite TI Genuine Gel saddle
|
Reviews 1 - 1 (1 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
