Road Bike, Cycling Forums banner

Understanding the Cycling 3 Foot Rule

11K views 41 replies 16 participants last post by  fiziks  
#1 · (Edited by Moderator)
Understanding the Cycling 3 Foot Rule

Editor's Note: RoadBikeReview contributor Megan Hottman is a recognized legal expert on cycling laws and advocate in the cycling community. She provides bike law education clinics and classes to cyclists, local bike clubs and to law enforcement personnel. Images courtesy www.hottmanlawoffice.com and bikeyface.com.

The driver of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicyclist proceeding in the same direction shall allow the bicyclist at least a three-foot separation between the right side of the driver's vehicle, including all mirrors or other projections, and the left side of the bicyclist at all times. But how much is 3 feet, really? Approximately the length of your arm (this is why our cycling team jackets have rulers on the backs of our sleeves).

Understanding the Cycling 3 Foot Rule

In my opinion, though, the law really should include the words "when safe to do so." In other words, if a motorist cannot safely give a cyclist three feet when passing, without interfering with oncoming traffic, the motorist should slow down and wait behind the cyclist, while oncoming traffic passes, and then proceed to pass the cyclist with the 3-foot buffer.

I experienced this myself firsthand a few years ago when a large pick-up truck passed me from behind, giving me in excess of 3 feet. Unfortunately for him, the same make and model truck was approaching from the opposite direction. The truck passing me crossed the centerline to give me space, but in doing so, he crossed the center line and went into oncoming traffic's lane.

The result is that they sheared one another's side mirrors off. The oncoming truck was driven by an off-duty police officer. He informed the truck passing me that he needed to WAIT BEHIND ME before attempting to pass with three feet. The driver attempting to pass me was obligated to pay for the damage to both trucks and was cited as the at-fault party. I felt terrible because I was so grateful he had given me so much passing room.

But the reality is the 3-foot law does not override or supersede a driver's obligation to ensure it is safe to pass or cross the center line. The driver must check for oncoming traffic first. If oncoming traffic prevents passing a cyclist with three feet, the motorist must wait behind the cyclist. Not crowd into them in the lane. Not swerve back over into the lane and knock the cyclist off the road. Wait. Safety first. Then, 3 feet. Many motorists do not realize this is the proper analysis.

As luck would have it, as I was writing this article Jerry N., an avid cyclist and cycling advocate, contacted me. He informed me that very recently, he called Colorado State Patrol to report a motorist who passed him too closely and CSP pursued the motorist and issued a 3-foot law violation citation. Jerry asked me not to share his full name, or the complaint and report, since the case is currently pending, but he did offer some advice to cyclists who want to report this type of encounter:

Megan: Jerry, this is great news that you took the time to place the call and complete a traffic complaint report - and that CSP took it seriously and pursued it. What advice would you give other cyclists who wish to do the same when a motorist passes them too closely or "buzzes" them?

Jerry: Well, it takes a moment to collect yourself after suddenly feeling as though you are dazed and confused. Make sure that you are first able to safely maintain your line and resume your presence of mind to operate the bike within your comfort zone. Then, as you do so, look up, gain a visual on the license plate. Recite the number to yourself. Then repeat the number internally or aloud. Then associate a date, a month and a calendar day to the numerical portion of the license number. Use words beginning with the letters that appear on the plate. Keep repeating these to yourself in order that you can remember it. Commit the vehicle type, make, model, color and approximate year and try somehow to ascertain a visual on the driver. Commit the driver's physical features to memory so that you may describe and or visually identify the driver at a later time.

Stop when it is safe to do so and call state patrol. Tell the dispatcher where you are and why you are calling. He or she will then patch you through to the local jurisdictional authority. Be prepared to provide a detailed description of the sequence of events and depending on the severity of the alleged transgression you may request an officer or agent respond in person or you may ask, otherwise to create a case file.

If you are unable to physically identify the driver law enforcement may not respond in person but are likely to accept your request to record a driver in the registered vehicle you describe on file as having failed to yield a three foot berth or as having presumably driven intentionally close to you or whatever may be the case in your circumstance.

Megan: Jerry, as you are probably aware, law enforcement officers do not often cite motorists with a 3-foot violation - even where a motorist hits a cyclist. What steps would you like to see us as cyclists taking, to encourage law enforcement to use this statute more often, and to enforce it?

Jerry: Call it in whenever the situation arises and as often as you fall victim to the menace, threat, discourtesy, ill will or pure negligence, apathy, disregard or complete ignorance of the law. A deluge of ongoing reports of this nature will trigger flag words in dispatch recordings being monitored and lead to heightened awareness within agencies which share volumes and frequencies of calls received on specific matters or common subjects.

The officer I most recently spoke with (who issued the summons I requested against a driver), told me over the phone that he believed the law was limited in its purview only to roads in rural locations such as winding mountain roads. I asked him to go and review and read the statute. When I spoke with him the following day he begged my pardon and admitted that he was unaware of the breadth of the law and that is does, in fact, apply to all circumstances of a cyclist being overtaken or passed by a motor vehicle. This means on all roadways, streets and highways inside the state of Colorado. So, with this being said, we as cyclists ought to concern ourselves with increasing awareness of the law and its application in as many ways as we can.

For more from the Cyclist Lawyer, please visit www.hottmanlawoffice.com.

 

Attachments

#3 ·
1. Good Morning
2. The primary issue is CELL PHONE use by drivers in the lane adjacent to the shoulder. These drivers are non-cyclists, and cyclists as well.
3. Secondary issue are drivers with poor eyesight.
4. Lastly, people who have no clue to Rules of the Road.
..Yes, I am a County Police Officer in Maryland, and a cyclist.
 
#4 ·
So my question has always been this: Given that the average lane is 12 feet wide and the average car is 6 feet wide, when two neighboring cars are centered in their lanes they are 6 feet apart. In other words, our current system (only where 3 feet laws exist) gives metal fenders 6 feet of clearance BUT human skin only gets 3 feet of clearance. WTF.......... Why Three Feet?

Don't humans deserve at least the same safety margin as sheet metal?.
 
#6 ·
We've had the 3-foot law in the state where I live since 2009. Since then we've had no fewer than three cyclists killed by motorists and not one of them was charged with violating the new law. The very first one famously involved the owner of a bike shop in one of my state's largest cities, and the driver in that case wasn't charged with any moving violation at all. There was one incident of a fourth cyclist who was struck and seriously injured (but not killed), and the driver _was_ charged in that case, but not in any of the three cases I know of to a certainty that involved the death of the cyclist. In fact, in my experience, the police themselves are among the worst violators.

Cell phones, eye sight and ignorance of the rules aside, most motorists JUST DON'T CARE. They're too self-absorbed and can't be bothered to slow down and overtake cyclists at a safe speed and distance because they think whatever they have waiting at the other end of their trip is just too vital to be late for. Certainly not worth the 15 seconds it would take for them to slow down and safeguard my life.

The irony is I regularly see motorists give me and my bicycle a wide birth (especially since I put more flashing red lights on the back of my bike than a Macy's Christmas tree) only to force the oncoming motorist onto the shoulder of the road to avoid being hit. Which I consider proof that it goes deeper than just not according cyclists an ounce of respect.

They don't respect cyclists because we're no danger to them, even if they hit us. And there's little to no danger of any repercussion if they DO hit us (except some minor body work), so why be bothered? They think if they keep punish-passing us often enough, we'll eventually "wise up" and take up another hobby.
 
#7 ·
The 3-foot law applies only to motorized vehicles.

The driver of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicyclist proceeding in the same direction shall allow the bicyclist at least a three-foot separation between the right side of the driver's vehicle, including all mirrors or other projections, and the left side of the bicyclist at all times.
 
#10 ·
This is the reply when I tried to report a truck passing to close. Good Morning, this page is not monitored 24/7 so I apologize for the delay in response. If something like this happens again, please call our non-emergency line at 203-481-4241 and an officer can respond. Unfortunately, we do not send infractions via mail to owners of vehicles because we need to ensure we have the correct operator of the vehicle and conduct a proper investigation. For example, the registered owner might have had a family member operating the vehicle that day. If you called at the time, we can have an officer come directly to that area and locate the vehicle. observe operation, conduct a motor vehicle stop and identify the operator. It is likely the officer would then contact you to obtain a statement regarding the incident. Due to the time elapsed, I can share this information with patrol to be aware of this vehicle and the unsafe passing. Thank you for your message. -Lt. Carangelo Enter Write to Branford Police Department
 
#15 ·
Unless you get hit by a car the police are worthless.
Consider it from the police perspective:
If every citizen reported every single offence to the police and expected action they'd be swamped. Would this even hold up in court? If they're good people I have no doubt the police would want to help in situations like this, but at the same time they have the bigger picture to deal with. The police are human and are an organization working within a budget; they must prioritize.​

And from an outside perspective:
Ticketing one driver may or may not even change that driver's future actions; think of how many people get multiple speeding tickets. But, changing your riding habits could affect how you interact with every other vehicle on the road. Who gave this vehicle the room to complete a close pass with no safe escape path? What may have happened differently if the cyclist was in the middle of the lane?​

I realize how unnerving it can be when someone passes that close so I'm not diminishing that by any means. However, there are lessons to be learned on both sides of this incident...
 
#16 ·
Also consider that the road you may be on may be covered by multiple jurisdictions, city police, county sheriff and even state highway patrol may all cover the same road. In my experience, small town police departments are probably the most likely to be ABLE to respond, but are also the most likely to NOT CARE. State Highway patrol is probably the least likely to be able to respond in a timely manner. Sheriff's departments usually strike a pretty good balance of ability to respond and at least actually taking your report (sheriff is elected and has to be concerned about public opinion). YMMV

I'm not likely to report someone who doesn't give me a full three feet. But if they run me off the road, I will report if I have video evidence.
 
#19 ·
I usually have at least two lights on the back of my bike when riding solo (one flashing and one constant). I also wear jerseys with multiple bright colors. These tend to get noticed more than monotone jerseys, even my safety yellow one. I also have a Cookie Monster jersey, which gets noticed by kids. I've had parents walk up to me to get their kids' picture taken with the Cookie Monster biker.
 
#23 ·
My only input is that rules for vehicles and cyclists should be at least 10% of any state driver license written exam. Not a fix, but awareness of cyclists starting early in a driver's tenure. Cyclists and vehicles rules should be as prominent as any other rule.

An evaluation for situational awareness on a road test or driving school endorsement for licensure is a maybe also.
 
#24 · (Edited)
I'm not sure how long the written test is here but 10% seems low enough people could just hope for a good guess. Maybe at least having the questions on there would increase some knowledge a bit though.
I can deal with close passes, as long as I can tell they know I'm there. What really annoys me is when drivers follow me forever at 20ish mph because they have no idea if they're allowed to pass. Then I have to deal with an angry mob behind them once they finally make their move. Then there's the overly nice people who will stop in the middle of the road to yield. I've yelled at those people way more than anyone making a close pass and I'm certain they're more likely to cause an accident. I've given up my right of way and waved vehicles across intersections many times to give me a few more seconds to drink some water after a light turns green. But there's no chance I'm putting myself in harms way just because someone wants to be so nice they create an even more dangerous situation.
 
#26 ·
There will always be people triggered by cyclists. It is just a matter of how much of the population, and how vocal they are. For the most part, people in Minnesota are pretty respectful, although I find a little less tolerance in the northern half of the state. Wisconsin, at least around the lakes, seems pretty decent, too. I have some friends from Florida who say it is horrible down there.

I wonder if there is a correlation between the number/quality of bike trails in a state and the population's general disposition towards cyclists?
 
#28 ·
True. Here, pedestrians are a much bigger threat, mostly because they simply aren't paying attention (ear buds in, talking on phone, moving around ON THE TRAIL trying to get the best angle for a picture of a flower, etc).
 
#30 ·
This is the type of street or road that I ride on 80% of the time. I see cars in 1's and 2's every few minutes.

Come on now! Yesterday I was almost ran off the road by some landscapers towing 12 ft (est) trailer.

NO ONE HERE BUT US, YET HERE WE ARE BEING DB's... for no reason.

Image
 
#38 ·
This is the type of street or road that I ride on 80% of the time. I see cars in 1's and 2's every few minutes.

Come on now! Yesterday I was almost ran off the road by some landscapers towing 12 ft (est) trailer.

NO ONE HERE BUT US, YET HERE WE ARE BEING DB's... for no reason.

View attachment 490615
Last week, on a similar road (2-lane, no shoulder, but mostly fields instead of trees - although there were some trees), I got passed by a landscaper with a huge load of loose dirt. The wind was blowing straight towards me and the dirt was blowing off the flatbed as they drove by leaving a giant yellow cloud of dirt dust. It not only made me cough, but obscured my visibility as well as the visibility of drivers coming up behind me for a few minutes. But it took several MILES for the cloud to completely dissolve. The guy was a hazard to everyone, not just bikers.