AbsoluteBLACK oval chainrings review

Potential for pedal stroke smoothing makes these rings worth a look

AbsoluteBLACK Oval Chainrings Review

You’ll either like the look or you won’t.

What is it?

The PR claim is that by using oval shaped (rather than round) chainrings, pedaling smoothness and overall efficiency is improved because the impact of the dead spot in your pedal stroke is minimized. Various iterations of the concept have been around for years, but it has never gained widespread acceptance. However, some pro riders such as reigning Tour de France champ Chris Froome and the now-retired Bradley Wiggins have used oval rings (from a different manufacturer) to great success, and many amateur riders swear by their effectiveness.

AbsoluteBLACK Oval Chainrings Review

Six machined up-shift ramps on the backside of these rings help keep shifting relatively crisp and smooth.

AbsoluteBLACK promotes its oval chainrings as being among the best due to the refinement of design and detail via use of top materials and state-of-the-art CNC milling machines. The company makes a huge variety of oval rings for both mountain and road bikes. RoadBikeReview tested a 52-36 set-up on an 11-speed Shimano Ultegra drivetrain. Test ring weights were 140 grams for the 52t and 35 grams for the 36t (175 grams total). The standard Ultegra set-up that was removed weighed 148 grams total, but had a smaller tooth count (33 grams for the 34t inner ring; 115 grams for the 50t outer).

  • Some improvement on very steep climbs
  • Subtle smoothing of pedal stroke
  • Options for most bike set-ups
  • Durable aluminum construction
  • Potential placebo effect
  • Chris Froome swears by oval rings
  • The look (if that’s your thing)
  • Slight shifting degradation
  • Some impact to “feel” of pedal stroke
  • The look (if that’s not your thing)
  • Break up of drivetrain system
  • Slight weight penalty
  • Rings can collect road gunk and grime
  • Lack of concrete science behind claims
AbsoluteBLACK Oval Chainrings Review

Our test set-up was a Parlee Z5 SL with Shimano Ultegra drivetrain and ENVE carbon wheels.

RoadBikeReview’s Take

Did these oval chainrings make a huge difference in my riding experience? Probably not. But I did manage to PR a few short steep climbs while they were mounted on my road bike. Current level of fitness certainly played some role in those efforts. (I was going good then.) But I also believe that the subtle dead spot smoothing helped increase efficiency just a fraction, meaning my legs didn’t load up with lactate acid quite as quickly. It also took very little time to get used to the feel, which is a frequent complaint among oval ring detractors. When I first made the switch, things felt a little off. But within a handful of rides all seemed normal again.

AbsoluteBLACK Oval Chainrings Review

The lattice-pattern on the front of the rings helps keep weight low, but creates a trap for grit and grime.

It’s also worth noting that I stepped up from a round 50-34 set-up to an oval 52-36, yet did not feel over-geared on steep climbs because the oval 36t ring essentially mimics the feel of a 34t when you’re in the weaker portion of your pedal stroke. Conversely the 52t big ring meant I was less likely to get spun out during descents. But a standard 52t would still be preferred to maintain speed going downhill.

AbsoluteBLACK Oval Chainrings Review

These oval rings come in a wide variety of BCDs to fit nearly any road or MTB drivetrain.

Other knocks against the set-up include the look, which is a little loud for my tastes, and shifting feel. I never had issues with dropping the chain or anything like that. But even with the absoluteBLACK’s six machined up-shift ramps, changing gears was not as crisp as with the standard round-ring Shimano Ultegra set-up. Was it a deal breaker? No. Was it noticeable? Yes.

AbsoluteBLACK Oval Chainrings Review

The machining detail on these rings is impressive.

Bottom line, I believe the ideal application for this set-up is for the rider who does a lot of low-cadence climbing or on a 1x mountain bike drivetrain, where front derailleur shifting is not an issue, and steep, low cadence climbing is frequent. I also think that if you’re at all curious, they’re worth trying for yourself. The barrier to entry is not that high, and you may find that you love the results.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5
Price: $126 for 52t; $62 for 36t
More Info: absoluteblack.cc and check out the promotional video below.

[vimeo width=”610″ height=”343″]https://vimeo.com/152897512[/vimeo]
Love checking out the latest cycling products? See more in RoadBikeReview’s coverage of the 2016 Eurobike trade show.

About the author: Jason Sumner

An avid cyclist, Jason Sumner has been writing about two-wheeled pursuits of all kinds since 1999. He’s covered the Tour de France, the Olympic Games, and dozens of other international cycling events. He also likes to throw himself into the fray, penning first-person accounts of cycling adventures all over the globe. Sumner, who joined the RoadBikeReview.com / Mtbr.com staff in 2013, has also done extensive gear testing and is the author of the cycling guide book "75 Classic Rides: Colorado." When not writing or riding, the native Coloradoan can be found enjoying time with his wife Lisa and daughter Cora.

Related Articles


  • frank says:

    I’m surprise the science hasn’t either proven or disproven oval rings by now since they’ve been around since the turn of the century, then in the mid 1980’s when Shimano introduced a better version called Bio Pace, and a lot of bikes had them, and since then there has been various manufactures who made them, yet no concrete evidence of effectiveness according to the article? I’m not sure if that is true because there is evidence that oval chainrings are better for knees, they’re better for maintaining a constant slower cadence which would be idea for mountain bikers, triathletes, and people who tour, however if the chainring is ovalized correctly, like the Bio Pace was, a person can actually spin faster without bouncing in the saddle as much as you would with a round gear at the same higher cadence. That reason of spinning more effectively is probably why the writer of this article was able to increase the gear ratio and still feel like he lost no effectiveness. So I think the evidence is there in favor of oval gears but for some reason there hasn’t been a widespread acceptance.

  • Marty says:

    I share Frank’s puzzlement about the lack of hard evidence about the effectiveness of oval chainrings. Though it is very difficult to objectively and accurately quantify their effect on a human rider (and physiology is a big factor), it should be easy enough to measure the efficiency of a motorized machine that simulates a rider’s pedal stroke (and dead spot) at several cadences. —– If anyone knows of such a study, please tell me about it! Thanks…

  • Clark Shaffer says:

    I can only that I’ve been using oval rings since the very 1st iteration of the Bio Pace ring offering and have noticed a substantial benefit over the years. When I used the 1st set I was just coming off my 3rd knee surgery. Knee pain was chronic and worsening due to several factors not related to cycling. The elimination of the dead spot was immediately noticeable and reduced a great deal of fatigue. It might be worth mentioning that my VERY FIRST bike ride was a 100 mile adventure in the Wild West 100 in Waco in 1984. In short, the oval rings have allowed me to close gaps during road races faster than I could with the standard round ring and allow me to climb hills faster and more efficiently than I ever could with standard round rings. From time to time, especially when I have to rent a bike when on vacations, transitioning back to standard round rings always causes knee pain.

Leave a Reply to Clark Shaffer Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





© Copyright 2020 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.