Frame size and rider weight can make a big difference in your perceptions. The oddballs in the R3 are the 49 and 51cm sizes. They have very short front-centers, overly quick steering and the ride is quite stiff. The rest have fairly standard geometry. I owned a 51cm R3 and sold it have four 50 miles rides -just didn't like it. I then got the standard 585 in a 51cm size (S) and I've been on it since the spring of 2006. It's been really great.varian72 said:Anyone ridden both and decided on the 585 Ultra over the R3? Why?
Outside of fit did you find one stiffer? harsher? better at climbing? Decending?
I live in VT so soaking up the road cracks is a big question for me.
Thanks.
I ride a size S. I really can't recommend the 51cm R3.varian72 said:I would be a size 51 in the R3.
Are you a size small in the Look? Look forward to your Ultra impressions. Some good 07 deals out there.
Something else to consider: (keeping in mind what C-40 said).varian72 said:I would be a size 51 in the R3.
Are you a size small in the Look? Look forward to your Ultra impressions. Some good 07 deals out there.
In the 51cm size, the HTA is much different on the RS, at only 71 degrees, instead of 73 and an oddball 53mm rake is used to reduce the trail to 60mm. The Cervelo should require one size longer stem than the LOOK.acid_rider said:Something else to consider: (keeping in mind what C-40 said).
Cervelo RS is very close to R3 geometry (same STA and HTA and main tube lengths) but with 10mm longer rear chain stays and a 20mm taller headtube. So in a 51cm size the RS might offer a better geometry that 51cm R3 would.