Road Bike, Cycling Forums banner
1 - 3 of 3 Posts

· Daylight Fading
Joined
·
1,903 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
This from cyclingnews.com.

Bordry critical of UCI testing
By: Cycling NewsPublished: June 9, 10:47, Updated: June 9, 10:23Edition:First Edition Cycling News, Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Pierre Bordry

view thumbnail gallery
Frenchman says doping still easy to practice

French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD) chief Pierre Bordry has criticised the testing undertaken by the International Cycling Union (UCI) at the Tour de France, labelling it "predictable and ineffective".

Bordry, whose organisation has long been at loggerheads with cycling's governing body, told the 'Frontal 21' program on German TV network ZDF, "The tests are arranged so that the riders know in advance" when they will be subject to anti-doping scrutiny.

Critical of the UCI's methods, Bordry said, "There are not enough targeted controls, too little training [for testers] and unannounced inspections; someone who wants to dope knows the system perfectly well."

The program pointed out that when the AFLD did not conduct testing - at last year's Tour de France - not one doping case was discovered. Meanwhile, when it participated in anti-doping scrutineering during the 2008 Tour, the likes of Stefan Schumacher, Leonardo Piepoli, Bernhard Kohl and Riccardo Riccó were all outed for taking banned substances.

These latest comments come after Bordry last month sent an email to UCI President Pat McQuaid offering to conduct more testing throughout this year's Tour de France, citing the apparent lax treatment of Team Astana at last year's Tour as evidence of the need for assisting cycling's governing body in its anti-doping efforts.

And while McQuaid criticised the AFLD for carrying out minimal testing prior to last year's race, Bordry explained that the UCI has again refused to share athletes' whereabouts details with the AFLD, in a situation similar to that encountered before last year's race.

"There are teams which have never given us or the UCI [athletes'] whereabouts or only when it's too late," said Bordry. "We want to control the riders who will be training in France before the race starts. Without those files, it will be difficult to find them but we'll try and find a solution."

Follow Cyclingnews on Twitter for the very latest coverage of events taking place in the cycling world - twitter.com/cyclingnewsfeed


A comment and a few questions.

The claim that the UCIs testing is too predictable raised this question in my mind. If that's the case, implying that rriders would know how and when to dope and when NOT to, wouldn't the Bio Passport program catch these riders? I mean, it's one thing to stop doping when you know you may be tested, but that would also most certainly affect other blood values, right? So I dunno if I really buy this argument from Bordry.

Is the AFLD testing at this year's Tour? Where have they tested this year? Maybe I'm forgetting, but I don't think that their testing has caught anyone this year has it? Bordry argues that last year's Tour was not clean, it was simply that the UCI did the testing and not the AFLD. But if the AFLD tested at races this year and has caught no one, then who's to say they are really any better.

Folks, enlighten me, please.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,349 Posts
eyebob said:
A comment and a few questions.

The claim that the UCIs testing is too predictable raised this question in my mind. If that's the case, implying that rriders would know how and when to dope and when NOT to, wouldn't the Bio Passport program catch these riders?
Like always the answer depends on the drug, how it's used, how much is taken and when it is taken, all assuming there is a test that can detect it.

E.g., there was a whole rash of testosterone positives back when Gripper took over and actually made the testing less predictable.

I'd put good money on a whole rash of EPO positives if the testers suddenly started showing up late at night.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top