this is bizzare to say the least.....
http://easylink.playstream.com/katu/060117_trimet_attack_pkg.wvx
http://easylink.playstream.com/katu/060117_trimet_attack_pkg.wvx
This event played out about a month ago in Portland, OR. The story is that dude riding his bike over one of Portland's many bridges gets buzzed (he claims) by the bus. He was not on the designated bike path on the bridge because, he claims, it contained dangerous amounts of gravel. He catches said bus and stands in front. Bus driver lets aggrieved passenger off bus to assault cyclist. Passenger then gets back on bus and bus continues on route. Cyclists sues transit authority.bjm said:this is bizzare to say the least.....
http://easylink.playstream.com/katu/060117_trimet_attack_pkg.wvx
That vigilante justice - it's the best! And you bet, city bus drivers should not only buzz cyclists, they should encourage their passengers to beat up anyone who gets in their way. Or, they could just save time and run over the bike riders. This is the way things should work, in your bizzarro world.studiddy said:From what I have gathered here I hope he loses. Gravel or not, if there is a bike land and he's not in it, what does he realistically expect? Like the jackasses who jog in the bike lane around here and get pissed if I don't go out of my way to avoid them. Run on the sidewalk. If I were on the bus I'd want to beat his ass too for standing in front of it.
ROLF! Good one, Kerry.Kerry Irons said:That vigilante justice - it's the best! And you bet, city bus drivers should not only buzz cyclists, they should encourage their passengers to beat up anyone who gets in their way. Or, they could just save time and run over the bike riders. This is the way things should work, in your bizzarro world.![]()
And therein lies the argument against having bike lanes. Are you sure you shouldn't be at forums.carsrule.com?studiddy said:Gravel or not, if there is a bike land and he's not in it, what does he realistically expect?
DrRoebuck said:And therein lies the argument against having bike lanes. Are you sure you shouldn't be at forums.carsrule.com?
Btw, as far as I know, streets are softer than sidewalks, which is why joggers prefer them. I agree they can be a nuisance, but at least there's a reason why ...
I don't think you have to make a "dent" in order for your body to appreciate a difference. I don't know this for a fact, but it's something I've read here and there.stuart said:the notion of someone running on asphalt (the street) because it is "softer" than concrete (the sidewalk) is specious.
the asphalt would indeed be "softer" if the runner weighed a couple of tons; but even a 250 pound runner won't make a dent (literally) in the asphalt.
How about some simple experiments? Put down the kickstand on that Huffy on asphalt and see how soon it leaves a dent. There is NO QUESTION than asphalt is more forgiving under a foot strike than concrete. No advanced scientific understanding to see/feel this.stuart said:the notion of someone running on asphalt (the street) because it is "softer" than concrete (the sidewalk) is specious. the asphalt would indeed be "softer" if the runner weighed a couple of tons; but even a 250 pound runner won't make a dent (literally) in the asphalt.
Kerry Irons said:How about some simple experiments? Put down the kickstand on that Huffy on asphalt and see how soon it leaves a dent. There is NO QUESTION than asphalt is more forgiving under a foot strike than concrete. No advanced scientific understanding to see/feel this.
Kerry Irons said:How about some simple experiments? Put down the kickstand on that Huffy on asphalt and see how soon it leaves a dent. There is NO QUESTION than asphalt is more forgiving under a foot strike than concrete. No advanced scientific understanding to see/feel this.
Kerry Irons said:How about some simple experiments? Put down the kickstand on that Huffy on asphalt and see how soon it leaves a dent. There is NO QUESTION than asphalt is more forgiving under a foot strike than concrete. No advanced scientific understanding to see/feel this.
Before I blew out my knee and thereby removed 2/3s of my miniscus, I would have agreed with you. Now that I have much less cushioning in my knee, I can state without a doubt that the asphault is softer than concrete and it can be a very noticable difference.stuart said:the notion of someone running on asphalt (the street) because it is "softer" than concrete (the sidewalk) is specious.
the asphalt would indeed be "softer" if the runner weighed a couple of tons; but even a 250 pound runner won't make a dent (literally) in the asphalt.
Brilliant... not. An adjacent bike lane whether safe to use or not does automatically require the cyclist use it legally speaking. Nor does it's mean a motorist has the right to not pass safely or for a knucklehead like you to commit assault and battery. Why someone such as you would ever look at much less participate in cycling forum is baffling. Have a nice ride... and watch your back.studiddy said:From what I have gathered here I hope he loses. Gravel or not, if there is a bike land and he's not in it, what does he realistically expect? Like the jackasses who jog in the bike lane around here and get pissed if I don't go out of my way to avoid them. Run on the sidewalk. If I were on the bus I'd want to beat his ass too for standing in front of it.
bsaunder said:Before I blew out my knee and thereby removed 2/3s of my miniscus, I would have agreed with you. Now that I have much less cushioning in my knee, I can state without a doubt that the asphault is softer than concrete and it can be a very noticable difference.