Joined
·
799 Posts
I did my first CTS Field Test yesterday, using a Garmin 500, but no power. I live in an extremely hilly area, and my main goal is climbing, so I used a course with a flat warm-up area, and average grade of 4.1% (although most of our climbs are steeper). I did a pretty good job of with consistency of the two 8-minute efforts, although I started the second one a little closer to the base of the hill, and faster (was trying to reach the same point for the second start). My cadence sensor had gotten bumped and wasn't working for the first FastPedal, but I fixed it right after that. The two 1-minute PowerIntervals I did at the bottom of the same climb. If it matters, I'm 42, 6'-3" and 180 lb, been doing fast group rides (but not racing) for quite a while.
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/42368604
I'm starting the CTT program and trying to figure out what to use for the average HR to base my training zones on. I was spinning quite a bit faster (94-96 RPM) than I normally would on a climb, for some reason, and my speed might've been higher if I'd gone up a cog, but I defintely had the "please let me die now" feeling for most of the climbs, and finished both of them hard. My average HR was 168 for both, but after 1:45 I kept it at 170, and finished at 172-174. Looking at the data, I would think it makes more sense to use 170 instead of 168 for my training zones; what do you think? Any other comments?
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/42368604
I'm starting the CTT program and trying to figure out what to use for the average HR to base my training zones on. I was spinning quite a bit faster (94-96 RPM) than I normally would on a climb, for some reason, and my speed might've been higher if I'd gone up a cog, but I defintely had the "please let me die now" feeling for most of the climbs, and finished both of them hard. My average HR was 168 for both, but after 1:45 I kept it at 170, and finished at 172-174. Looking at the data, I would think it makes more sense to use 170 instead of 168 for my training zones; what do you think? Any other comments?