JimT said: I guess it all comes down to some wheels are a better than others but the determining factor is what you can afford. I want to get the best that I can afford, unfortunately I can not afford the Nirvana's (they are my dream wheelset, hint to Zen)
Yes and hell yes!
JimT said: I am sure the Eastons will be a significant step up from what I have now (Ksyrium Elites) but if I was to opt for the the higher price Edge I really don't think there would be a very appreciable difference over the Eastons but I may be wrong. The Eastons did get great reviews from bikeradar.com and they are warranteed for 2 years like the others.
I think you would be extremely happy with the Eastons v. Elites. I wasn't impressed at all with the Mavic K's. Just about everyone else loves them though. IMHO, not as stiff as what everyone hypes them to be. Went out of true easily. Had to tighten up the hubs constantly. Anyways, I dumped them quickly for a DT Swiss RR1.1 for a training wheel and went with the Eastons for a race set. I currently have the EA50's for a trainer set and while the I (feel) that the EC90's accelerate much faster, once up to speed I can not feel a difference.
It would be great to demo a set of Eastons and a comparable Edge with same spokes, hubs and tires.
JimT said: I read about Zipps being 20 seconds faster over 40K (or something like that) but at my level as a recreational rider/local club rider I guess shaving seconds isn't really that importaint for me. The fellows can wait for me at the end for that time, they always wait for me now anyway
For the money, I like Easton. Even better than Zipp. My experience and impression of Zipp was that they are fragile as compared to Eastons. Others have had the opposite experience!
Obviously, I have no way to know if one wheel is "faster" than the other, but the differences we are talking about are not worth talking about. It comes down to perceived worth. In the end, smart training, sleep, and nutrition are vastly more important.