350 miles a week....why thats 50 miles a day....and you go to the gym...you must be single.Don't try to replicate the movements of cycling in the gym! Do compound movements to strengthen the core and improve the posture on and off the bike.
Again, don't waste time on isolation movements, do compound movements. Keep it simple: dead lifts, squats, bench press, shoulder press, pull-ups, dips and push-ups is all you need. Heavy weights, low (4-10) reps will be the most beneficial. High reps (14 or more) will do no good for you, it will only make it more difficult to recover.
Your body is already under a lot of stress to recover from cycling, so your lifting should be intense but short. Do each of the exercise mentioned above once every 5-7 days! Warm up properly and then 4-6 sets of 4-10 reps with heavy weights.
In addition to riding 250-350 mi a week I do 3 or 4 gym workouts every week. I have free weights in my basement so this routine does not take much time. My workouts look something like this:
workout 1: dead lifts 5-6 sets and then squats 5-6 sets
workout 2: bench press 5-6 sets, dips 5-6 sets, push-ups 4 sets
workout 3: pull-ups and/or chin-ups 6-8 sets and then shoulder press with dumbbells or barbell 5-6 sets
What makes you think that you don't use the muscles needed for riding, when you ride?Looking for gym workouts for riding my road bike. I know I need good cardio and endurance but I also want to workout those muscles that are used to ride. Any info is greatly appreciated.
You got me. I am single and I have no social life. I know that is pathetic but at least I am fit.350 miles a week....why thats 50 miles a day....and you go to the gym...you must be single.
What makes you think he actually thinks that?What makes you think that you don't use the muscles needed for riding, when you ride?
So why shouldn't we try to mimic cycling movements? Isn't cycling what you're training for? Isn't a squat a some what similar movement?Don't try to replicate the movements of cycling in the gym! Do compound movements to strengthen the core and improve the posture on and off the bike.
Again, don't waste time on isolation movements, do compound movements. Keep it simple: dead lifts, squats, bench press, shoulder press, pull-ups, dips and push-ups is all you need. Heavy weights, low (4-10) reps will be the most beneficial. High reps (14 or more) will do no good for you, it will only make it more difficult to recover.
Your body is already under a lot of stress to recover from cycling, so your lifting should be intense but short. Do each of the exercise mentioned above once every 5-7 days! Warm up properly and then 4-6 sets of 4-10 reps with heavy weights.
In addition to riding 250-350 mi a week I do 3 or 4 gym workouts every week. I have free weights in my basement so this routine does not take much time. My workouts look something like this:
workout 1: dead lifts 5-6 sets and then squats 5-6 sets
workout 2: bench press 5-6 sets, dips 5-6 sets, push-ups 4 sets
workout 3: pull-ups and/or chin-ups 6-8 sets and then shoulder press with dumbbells or barbell 5-6 sets
Because the OP said they wanted to work out the muscles that are use to ride. Which is circular logic.What makes you think he actually thinks that?
Anyway OP. Developing better core strength, in the gym, feels like it's really helped me a lot.
MX is extremely physically demanding. Those who haven't done it can't really appreciate how tough it is. But it's way different, IMO, than the demands of cycling. Riding MX I never felt my cardio capacity as being limiting. It seemed to me it was all about full-body muscle endurance...not that improving cardio capacity is a bad thing....... 44 and have only been riding seriously for the last 6-7 months but have been riding to increase cardio for racing motocross for the past 10 years....
Have to disagree with some of your statement. I don't think the amount of core stimulation just from cycling is enough. I think you have to do core work outside of cycling. It seems to me (and from my experience) that adding some off the bike core work (I also think the core isn't just muscles of the trunk) will go along way to helping you on the bike.Best core muscle or any muscle work for cycling is done on the bike, because it's done in a manner that is specific to the demands.
Sure, but can anyone provide some fundamental evidence that non-bike core "strength" work actually improves endurance cycling performance? Or that you don't get sufficient stimulus for the "core" musculature from doing the actual exercise you are training for?Have to disagree with some of your statement. I don't think the amount of core stimulation just from cycling is enough. I think you have to do core work outside of cycling. It seems to me (and from my experience) that adding some off the bike core work (I also think the core isn't just muscles of the trunk) will go along way to helping you on the bike.
It's a lot like building a house/building(used to work in the building trades). By having a good foundation/base you able to build a house/building/fitness that is longer lasting and allows you to add on/improve over time. With out that your house/building/fitness won't last and you won't be able to expand it.
With good core strength,mobility and stability you'll have a better base to produce more power(watts) be more comfortable and be better suited to performance.
If you look at the work/writings of Stuart Magill ( I will admit that I haven't read enough of as there is a lot) and Gary Cook (FMS) sport performance can be enhanced by improved core strength, mobility and stability. Add that to the reduced risk of injury, and it doesn't take much time away from time on the bike, to improve your core. You can get a lot of bang for your buck with 15-20min of daily core work. Heck you don't even have to do every day to get the benefit.
Sure, but can anyone provide some fundamental evidence that non-bike core "strength" work actually improves endurance cycling performance? Or that you don't get sufficient stimulus for the "core" musculature from doing the actual exercise you are training for?
I'm not saying it's not a good idea to do core work, so let's make a clear distinction on that. I also agree we should be really clear what is meant by the loose phrase "core strength". Both words are usually misinterpreted, and no doubt the combination is as well.
Mostly this area is one of assumption and pre-conceived ideas, and usually promoted by strength and conditioning people with an agenda and not a lot to back it up. There is very little evidence that actually demonstrates a performance benefit for endurance cycling, or that there is all that much demand on the core when cycling, or that what "core" stimulus you attain from cycling training is insufficient to meet the demands of endurance cycling.
I think if people promote a performance benefit from a training intervention, then they should be able to demonstrate the evidence to support that claim.
Which is why I question it.