so cav rides 300km and wins the sprint like he was shot out of a freakin gun. so he is the best "sprinter". well he didn't exaclty coast for 300km. he not only rode as well as any non sprinter/climber in the race, he *also* was the best sprinter. i appreciate how a sprinter wins a flat stage of a GT, but a one-day classic is not exactly a sprinters race. why does someone like Cav only get credit for sprinting the last 200m. when does he become a great "all around" racer? I personally may have a fast sprint, but at the end of a race, if my legs are cooked, i have no sprint.