The experience wasn't bad at all! The padding on my shorts was sufficient for comfort. Out of the saddle climbing, the reduced weight measurably increased my bicycling pleasure. This was a one hour ride, but I don't see why I couldn't go all day.
To me what you just said is like someone telling me how great their electric car is because they only drive for 40 miles at a time.The experience wasn't bad at all! The padding on my shorts was sufficient for comfort. Out of the saddle climbing, the reduced weight measurably increased my bicycling pleasure. This was a one hour ride, but I don't see why I couldn't go all day.
I have a bunch of 20% hills on my ride that I take out of the saddle. Knocking 150g off the seat was noticeable.I'm afraid that I cannot concur that its "reduced weight measurably increased my bicycling pleasure," But DAMN, does it look SWEET!
You notice 150 gr of weight reduction? Have you ever heard of the placebo effect?I have a bunch of 20% hills on my ride that I take out of the saddle. Knocking 150g off the seat was noticeable.
While it doesn't have padding, the carbon is flexy so big bumps are absorbed a bit.
Only when I'm muscling my bike back and forth up a climb, and only because the saddle is at the top of the bike so it has the greatest moment in that scenario. The naysayers can naysay all they want, I don't care - climbing with a light bike is far more fun than with a heavy one.You notice 150 gr of weight reduction? Have you ever heard of the placebo effect?![]()
My ass is only in shape for 1.5 hr rides so anything longer wouldn't be scientific now would it?A one hour ride is not any kind of a test. Go and do a century (which is 100 miles, not 63 miles as some people here think) and then report back how sweet the saddle was.
just think of the possibilities of a pre-ride enema then. no need to post pics.Only when I'm muscling my bike back and forth up a climb, and only because the saddle is at the top of the bike so it has the greatest moment in that scenario. The naysayers can naysay all they want, I don't care - climbing with a light bike is far more fun than with a heavy one.
I'm just trying to make sense of how 150g is so significant weight to the healthy, capable human being that one has to "muscle" the bike.Only when I'm muscling my bike back and forth up a climb, and only because the saddle is at the top of the bike so it has the greatest moment in that scenario. The naysayers can naysay all they want, I don't care - climbing with a light bike is far more fun than with a heavy one.
The vast majority of people ride under a metric the vast majority of their rides. So For most of us, a saddle that's comfy out to 60 miles or so would be perfectly fine.To me what you just said is like someone telling me how great their electric car is because they only drive for 40 miles at a time.
A one hour ride is not any kind of a test. Go and do a century (which is 100 miles, not 63 miles as some people here think) and then report back how sweet the saddle was.
I've done 5 hours 30 minutes (183 km / 113 mi) on my Selle SMP Full Carbon once. Soaking wet and cold race which left me empty. Damn fine saddle passed test. I rode in a skinsuit with a short distance chrono kind of pad.A one hour ride is not any kind of a test. Go and do a century (which is 100 miles, not 63 miles as some people here think) and then report back how sweet the saddle was.
Haha, I love the internet.I'm just trying to make sense of how 150g is so significant weight to the healthy, capable human being that one has to "muscle" the bike.
brb, hittin' the 150g weights at the gym.
Perhaps he is in very in tune with his body? But, if it was me, wearing a different pair of glasses seem to make me go faster!You notice 150 gr of weight reduction? Have you ever heard of the placebo effect?![]()