Road Bike, Cycling Forums banner

Lugs vs. Welds

2246 Views 13 Replies 13 Participants Last post by  bigrider
Why one or the other? What's the real difference besides looks and old skool props?
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
$$Cha-Ching!!!$$

Welds are less labor-intensive and more cost-effective. Lugs are all about craftsmanship and elevating the frameset above the utilitarian level. I'm not sure anyone could demonstrate any inherent structural superiority between one and the other. I just really appreciate the look of well-sculpted, well-brazed lugs on a frame that is then tastefully painted to accent the work.
azmadoc said:
Why one or the other? What's the real difference besides looks and old skool props?
not much
Welding processes & Metalurgy

A piece of unheat treated carbon steel has a tensile strength of about 25,000lb/in sq. A piece of heat treated alloy steel can have tensile strengths greater than 400,000 lb/in sq.

Way back when, low end bikes like Schwinns were welded together out of low carbon unheat treated steel. They had to go with thick heavy tube sections to get the strength they needed. The high end bikes bake then used heat treated alloy steel. One of the problems about welding the metals of that era was once you welded the part you lost the heat treat and strength in the area within a couple of inches of the weld. Also due to the temperatures and atmosphere around the weld the metals would oxidize and some of the alloying elements would percipitate out and cause crystiline bounderies around the welds that were very brittle and could cause sudden failures under impact load.

To solve this the heat treated alloy tubes were silver soldered together using lugs at temperatures low enough to effect the strength and reliability of the tubes heat treat. The lugs also added reinforcement to the high stress transition areas of the frame.

Many new alloys have been created over the last 30 years. Many of which are air hardenable and weldable. Welding processess and materials have improved over the last 30 years so the alloys can be welded without risks. Add to that the new tappered tubes that are thick in the welded high stress areas and thin in the low stress areas.

Now a welded frame can be made lighter than a lugged frame. I am guessing welding takes less manpower than lugging and silver soldering. (certainly when you leave off the great paint details they use to hand paint around the lugs).

I like to flick the top tubes of the high end bikes at the bike store and am always amazed at the tone they make. That hollow high pitch tone you only get from very thin high strength heat treated metal. The old school bikes did not have that tone. The new frames are not as pretty but pound for pound they are a lot stronger than the old school frames.
See less See more
Probably the biggest reason

azmadoc said:
Why one or the other? What's the real difference besides looks and old skool props?
Lugs limit the size and shape of tubing that can be used. Lugs either come in a few basic sizes or have to be custom made to fit. This limits the size and shape of tubing that can be used with lugs. Oversize, ovalized, diamond shaped, teardrop, etc., all of these types of tubing can't be used with standard lugs. I suppose a skilled craftsman could make lugs to fit almost any shape and size of tubing but the cost would be prohibitive.
Mel Erickson said:
Lugs limit the size and shape of tubing that can be used. Lugs either come in a few basic sizes or have to be custom made to fit. This limits the size and shape of tubing that can be used with lugs. Oversize, ovalized, diamond shaped, teardrop, etc., all of these types of tubing can't be used with standard lugs. I suppose a skilled craftsman could make lugs to fit almost any shape and size of tubing but the cost would be prohibitive.
not always. My MXLs tubes are fluted.
azmadoc said:
Why one or the other? What's the real difference besides looks and old skool props?
Generalizations:

Lugs: Add material in a place where it makes a lot of sense. Add weight to a frame. Probably have some benefits in repairability, although this is more related to brazing rather than lugs per se. Look cool, to me. Allow for contrasting head tubes, which look cool to me. Take more time to build well. (the main reason almost all production bikes are welded). Great frames can be built with lugs.

Welds: Save weight, sometimes. Shorten build times, usually. Allow for a wider range of frame designs. Look ordinary and plain, to me. Great frames can be made by welding.

Don't forget fillet brazing, and don't stress on joining methods. If you want a lugged bike, there are some fantastic ones out there. If you want a welded bike, ditto.

For true happiness, choose a builder whose values and opinions mesh well with your own, and trust their judgement.

--Shannon
See less See more
IMHO: Lugs for me

azmadoc said:
Why one or the other? What's the real difference besides looks and old skool props?
I have 2 lugged/striped Waterford 2200 (853 steel) bikes because I just like the look of them, along with the threaded stems....Old fashioned? maybe, but virtually every bike ride there will be someone commenting as to how nice it looks...... :)
in my opinion many of the above links are absolutely useless. you're reading about how lugs are more sturdy by people who SELL lugged bikes. can you say advertising? i sure can.

according to sloane's complete book of bicycling, who quotes douglas hayduk's bicyclie metallurgy for the cyclist, there is no difference between a lugged frame or an unlugged frame. both can be made to be as strong as the other. "Any well-made frame has tubing ends accurately mitered so they butt tightly up against the tube they are to be welded, brazed, or lugged to. Inaccurately mitered tubing makes for a weak joint whether it's lugged or not".

A cheaply made frame is weaker than a more expensive one, because less care is taken with those butts. Lugged steel frames tend to cost a lot more than unlugged ones, not because they're lugged, but because they offer a certain "sex appeal" and, dare i say it, snobbiness. Unlugged frames are cheaper to make, sure. But take two $3000 steel frames next to each other, one lugged, one not, and chances are very good they're of equal quality, since equal care is taken with the butts.

lay the lug-debate to rest already. (by the way, am i the only one who thinks lugs do NOT look good?)

sd
See less See more
Tig welded frames can be made cheaper than lugged frames and are a little lighter. Neither is stronger than the other. It all boils down to what you want the bike to look like. If you want the retro look, get the lugs. If you don't care, go with tig welds.
shaq-d said:
they offer a certain "sex appeal" and, dare i say it, snobbiness.

lay the lug-debate to rest already. (by the way, am i the only one who thinks lugs do NOT look good?)

sd
i don't think someone who likes lugs is snobby at all. why should they be. like many purchases, there's a certain aesthetic involved. how something looks plays a very large role. not all lugged bikes are expensive, you can get an older lugged frame for cheap. you can get a nice modern lugged frame for no more then what many on these boards paid for their nice tigged or bonded frames.

and yes you are probably the only who thinks lugs do NOT look good. ;)

i like lugs, they are a classic aesthetic. i also like fillet brazed frames too, nice smooth and clean look. tig bikes are basically 'rough' looking joints, even on high end bikes. but all three can build a great riding machine.
Ginger or MaryAnne

Both are fine.
One is sexy looking and the other looks sleek and sturdy.

Which one had the lugged frame?

azmadoc said:
Why one or the other? What's the real difference besides looks and old skool props?
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top