ciclisto said:
Have a C-50 on order but recently test rode a R3 . this is a fantastic bike, light and stiff yet comfortable. Sloping tube is a put off but otherwise no faults. Any one with long term experience with a C-50 that has tried this new frame , I would like your contrasting them.
thanks.
One thing the R3 has going for it is price: pocket change compared to a C50. Bicycling Mag did a review and I dunno if that price is right, but $2500 for the frame. If you can get it discounted somewhere, perhaps just over $2k for one. Even at $2500 that is hundreds under what a C50 costs from Maestro even.
If you can get used to the pencil-thin seatstays (which they said you can bend with your thumb and forefinger), they said the bike is stiff and comfortable. Main cons was you are stretched out in an aero position and the fork doesn't do as good a job of dampening as the frame. Cervelo said it's their stiffest frame so far and weighs 880 gms. The test bike build with high end components came out to 14-15 lbs!
Face it, if Basso wins the TDF this year, the R3 will be the hot thing, just as Time frames are hot now mainly because of Boonen, when it had a reputation for being flexy.