Road Bike, Cycling Forums banner
1 - 20 of 25 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hi,

I need recommendation for a Cervelo S2 or S5. Looking for a versatile bike that do climbing and comfortable on long rides. Please dont give me more options for other bikes. Gonna be one of these two. Is the 2012 better than 2013 is also a tip i need. Thanks lot.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,906 Posts
The S5 is a lot more cheddar, but more comfortable.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,906 Posts
Cash. The long green.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
110 Posts
I rode both and like both, I have an S2 Ultegra currently and I feel it gives you most of what the S5 offers for most riders. Cervelo keeps the S2 around for a reason :) I think you would be pleased with either frame but for the most part an S2 with a nice wheel/tire upgrade trumps an S5 stock bike for the same money. If money is a consideration.

Oh...and as far as I'm aware the only difference from 2011 .vs 2012 .vs 2013 is paint.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
43 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Okay. I think i would go for the S5, i like it more. looks better i think. But, i think the 2012 versjon looks better than 2013. Is it stupid of me buying the 2012? I dont know if you get Di2 (Ultegra) on the 2012 versions inetgrted in the frame.,..
 

·
Recycle King
Joined
·
870 Posts

·
Recycle King
Joined
·
870 Posts
It's you. The smaller frame looks normal. It's the larger frame that give you the optical illusion.
 

·
Recycle King
Joined
·
870 Posts
I would say at least a 56cm or bigger since I remember someone posted a pic of there 54cm and it looks similar.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
37 Posts
Two years ago, I bought the S2 because I was not sold on the BBRight on the R3 at the time. I always felt proprietary systems are problematic and expensive when they do fail. This is a big reason I stay away from Specialized.

I absolutely love my S2 and only would be interested in upgrading to the S3 if they still produced it. I have rode the S5 and my personal opinion that it rode stiffer...and more linear (if that makes sense) than the S2. It tracked faster and seemed faster when the road was straight, but I always felt like the S2 as more nimble. My S2 was great before even with the stock Fulcrum Racing 7 (which really aren't a bad OEM set of wheels), but when I bought an aftermarket set of lighter, faster wheels, the bike really came alive! Then again, wheelset is the biggest single upgrade you can do to any bike. My choice would still be a S2, and just use the monetary difference to upgrade the wheelset. You'll see a larger performance gain.

Just reiterating what Roadone was saying.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,906 Posts
My S3 is from 2011, the last year of production and is threaded for external bearings. I didn't know it was ever offered with bbright.

Derp. I see you were referring to R3.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
37 Posts
My S3 is from 2011, the last year of production and is threaded for external bearings. I didn't know it was ever offered with bbright.

Derp. I see you were referring to R3.
Yah as far as I know, it's only the R3 and the S5 that have BBRight. This is where I feel the S3 was the pinnacle of design in the S-Series. Seatstays of the R3 for compliance, classic Soloist aerodynamics with very little proprietary in a lightweight package.

Form + Function.

If anything, I wish they would have dropped the S2 line and kept the S3, but sell it at a slightly lower pricepoint to make room for the S5.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
IMHO I think BBRight gets a bad rap. It's really just a pressfit 30 BB (uses the same cups) that's a little wider. The bearings in cups are exactly the same bearings used in a BB30 BB. While the design by bringing the NDS bearing further out, which impoves the BB, is unique it doesn't use any proprietary parts at all.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
37 Posts
IMHO I think BBRight gets a bad rap. It's really just a pressfit 30 BB (uses the same cups) that's a little wider. The bearings in cups are exactly the same bearings used in a BB30 BB. While the design by bringing the NDS bearing further out, which impoves the BB, is unique it doesn't use any proprietary parts at all.
While I agree with this, and it's essentially very similar to the BB386 EVO. All my bikes have the tried and true BSA bottom bracket that only requires one simple inexpensive tool and a small amount of grease to perform installation and removal. BSA has proven reliability and low cost along with it, to include being cross compatible to road, cyclocross, and mountain with the same part. From a builder and maintenance standpoint, I wouldn't be bothered if I had to go out and purchase a headset press but it is a more complicated process with a lot more tools involved, and the bearings are for the most part unserviceable. Now I am not trying to downplay the advantages to the press-fit bottom brackets, I am just stating that BSA exploits the disadvantages of the press-fit, and a proven system that has been around for years with proven reliability.

How To: BB30 Overhaul/Bearing Replacement | Volagi
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,294 Posts
Guys with an S2 will tell you to get an S2, S5 guys will say get an S5.

Go ride each and decide for yourself.

If you can drop the lute to get an S5...then by all means get an S5. Its the latest and greatest...and will probably be easier to sell down the line than he S2.

The S5 does have a taller headtube than the S2. For example a 54cm S2 has a 140mm HT and a 54cm S5 has a 154 HT. So as the S5 gets bigger...the more awkward it looks... especially with a high stack of spacers under the stem.
 
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top