Joined
·
36 Posts
Hi,
I'm looking for some tips about Sidi fitting differences. I have read that the sizes are "growing" and that the Ergo 2's are narrower in general, but am curious about differences between Genius 5's, 5.5's, 6.6's, and ergo 2's. I was told in a shop that 5.5 and 6.6 fit narrower than the 5's. True? I can only try on the Genius 5, but because I have a narrow heel, I am interested in the 6.6 or Ergo 2 for the heel lock feature. Sole stiffness is not a big issue for me and because of my below-detailed problems with some new shimano shoes I'm even inclined to opt for a less-stiff shoe like the basic genius 5. When people say narrower re: Sidi, do they mean actual width in the forefoot, or just low-volume?
A little info: I normally wear a 45.5-46 and have a very low volume foot, wide fore-foot, and long-ish toes. In the Genius 5, a 45 fits the ball, arch, and heel of my foot best, although it is a little crowded in the toe box, which fits with the idea here that the sizes fit larger than they used too, I've never worn a 45 before. I noticed some heel slip in the 45.5, and a little less still some in the 45.
Would appreciate any shared advice or experience!
Brian
FWIW:
I recently bought shimano SH-2220's which felt great in the store and made sense because I have enjoyed M225's for a couple years, but these make my feet go numb in 1-2 hrs normal riding, or about 15 minutes of a crit, which is unacceptable! (I tried many different insole and tightening combinations, even cutting away the insole under my toes to decrease the effective sole rocker, all for naught). I have never had problems with hot spots or numbness before, in flimsy old Look shoes, Specialized Comp Carbon shoes, nylon and carbon soled MTB shoes, small cleats, big cleats, whatever. But then again the Comp Carbons were the stiffest-soled of all those and they were only "8.5 out of 12.5" or something like that on the specialized stiffness scale. Becuase of that experience I am paranoid now about spending the money again on carbon shoes, but the uppers of my Adidas shoes are too soft for good support and because of the poor drilling and my heels-in pedalling style, with those shoes I can only find my position in speedplays, which wear out too fast and lack the lateral support my knees need. Anyways, huge pain in the a** but i would rather spend money and have shoes and pedals for the long run, I ride too much to not have supportive shoes and pedals.
(cross post from weightweenies)
I'm looking for some tips about Sidi fitting differences. I have read that the sizes are "growing" and that the Ergo 2's are narrower in general, but am curious about differences between Genius 5's, 5.5's, 6.6's, and ergo 2's. I was told in a shop that 5.5 and 6.6 fit narrower than the 5's. True? I can only try on the Genius 5, but because I have a narrow heel, I am interested in the 6.6 or Ergo 2 for the heel lock feature. Sole stiffness is not a big issue for me and because of my below-detailed problems with some new shimano shoes I'm even inclined to opt for a less-stiff shoe like the basic genius 5. When people say narrower re: Sidi, do they mean actual width in the forefoot, or just low-volume?
A little info: I normally wear a 45.5-46 and have a very low volume foot, wide fore-foot, and long-ish toes. In the Genius 5, a 45 fits the ball, arch, and heel of my foot best, although it is a little crowded in the toe box, which fits with the idea here that the sizes fit larger than they used too, I've never worn a 45 before. I noticed some heel slip in the 45.5, and a little less still some in the 45.
Would appreciate any shared advice or experience!
Brian
FWIW:
I recently bought shimano SH-2220's which felt great in the store and made sense because I have enjoyed M225's for a couple years, but these make my feet go numb in 1-2 hrs normal riding, or about 15 minutes of a crit, which is unacceptable! (I tried many different insole and tightening combinations, even cutting away the insole under my toes to decrease the effective sole rocker, all for naught). I have never had problems with hot spots or numbness before, in flimsy old Look shoes, Specialized Comp Carbon shoes, nylon and carbon soled MTB shoes, small cleats, big cleats, whatever. But then again the Comp Carbons were the stiffest-soled of all those and they were only "8.5 out of 12.5" or something like that on the specialized stiffness scale. Becuase of that experience I am paranoid now about spending the money again on carbon shoes, but the uppers of my Adidas shoes are too soft for good support and because of the poor drilling and my heels-in pedalling style, with those shoes I can only find my position in speedplays, which wear out too fast and lack the lateral support my knees need. Anyways, huge pain in the a** but i would rather spend money and have shoes and pedals for the long run, I ride too much to not have supportive shoes and pedals.
(cross post from weightweenies)