I ride a 58cm Specialized RoubaixComp27roadbike with a100mm stem which, although comforatble at first, feels 'too short'. I'll be changing over to a 110mm stem to get myself in a better tuck and not deteriorate steering/control inputs. I'm looking at my first fixed gear bike for ROAD riding. Looking at the 58cm geometry specs of the affordable Langster and Pista, these bikes are on the short side of the Comp27 in the same 58cm size, especially on the top-tube length. There aren't any of these two bikes (Langster and Pista) built up and ready to ride at any of the LBSs that I've called, but they are willing to order one for me. I'm thinking that I should order the next largest sizes available (62cm Langster or 59cm/61cm Pista) and just deal with the slightly increased stand-over height. Or is it better to stick to the smaller dimensions and adjust with a longer stem? I'll be using this bike for ROAD spinning between 30 and 50 miles or so, so 'comfort' is desired within what's afforded with these types of bike geometry. Seems like the 59cm Pista would be the better compromise size-wise. The Harris Cyclery f/braked Pista SE looks tempting, but the Langster has the f/r brake features I desire right now, thus my first pick, but it goes from 58cm then jumps up to 62cm.
How did you come to your decision on frame size and what should I expect ergonomically?
How did you come to your decision on frame size and what should I expect ergonomically?