You mean the ones who were trying? Take at look at GC after Stage 1 and think about the implications for team strategy.Mootsie said:50th today in the Route de Sud ITT that was uphill - supposedly were he should shine. You gotta think the Tour is out now. He was even beaten by 3 of his teammates.
Have you read any of his quotes? He said this is the race that he has to prove himself at. If today's result is a "motivated" effort on his part, he is in deep do do. He didn't have to beat all his teammates and screw up team strategy to show his form, but the dude didn't even come close to top 10/15 or 25.asgelle said:You mean the ones who were trying? Take at look at GC after Stage 1 and think about the implications for team strategy.
So now you're not sure?Mootsie said:If today's result is a "motivated" effort on his part ...
I am sure he's screwed unless JV knows something we don't.asgelle said:So now you're not sure?
And isn't that exactly the point? Vaughters may well have told him to take it easy. The team strategy isn't about racing his team mates in the TT, but conserving energy in a now meaningless stage so he's fresh to help Martin over the next two days.Mootsie said:I am sure he's screwed unless JV knows something we don't.
was that said before or after the team had a guy in second place overall?bigpinkt said:Tom was saying that he was targeting the TT ....perhaps he had a mechanical? Or maybe it is because he ____________ (Insert favorite TD excuse here)
Thus handing him a spot in the Tour?asgelle said:And isn't that exactly the point? Vaughters may well have told him to take it easy.
Trent Lowe finished right behind Dan Martin(2nd place rider). TD could have shown his form and not passed a teammate.den bakker said:was that said before or after the team had a guy in second place overall?
Maybe he does not have to show his form. Maybe the GC for their top rider is more relevant than ego polishing.Mootsie said:Trent Lowe finished right behind Dan Martin(2nd place rider). TD could have shown his form and not passed a teammate.
Maybe there is some hidden agenda, who knows. But at this point, I'd have to think that Tommy D does have to show some form. I don't think any good result that he'd be able to get is "ego polishing." It would just be showing that he is actually capable of a good result when the pressure is on to deliver. Has he shown anything recently to suggest that he is ready to deliver a quality result, or more realistically, some quality help to a GC rider in the Tour?den bakker said:Maybe he does not have to show his form. Maybe the GC for their top rider is more relevant than ego polishing.
HE has shown in the past that he can "perform" in races bigger than tour de sud so that's a non issue.kmac said:Maybe there is some hidden agenda, who knows. But at this point, I'd have to think that Tommy D does have to show some form. I don't think any good result that he'd be able to get is "ego polishing." It would just be showing that he is actually capable of a good result when the pressure is on to deliver. Has he shown anything recently to suggest that he is ready to deliver a quality result, or more realistically, some quality help to a GC rider in the Tour?
My bigger question is to myself about why I spend any time wondering about Tommy D's results, or lack thereof.
JV has spoken.AJL said:Geez, we'll find out soon enough. The Tour starts in less than 3 weeks. JV makes the decision, not us.
How come Dave Z. didn't make the cut!?ECF said:
Breakaways, sprints, but no real GC hopes. Oh, and Millar, for wankers' bike toss.ECF said:Details here... http://velonews.com/article/78885
I think his cracked vertebrae are healing more slowly then he'd like so he's not ready.Kestreljr said:How come Dave Z. didn't make the cut!?