my only concern is thr 16/20 hole count. I want to avoid thr zipp stock hubs.

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

my only concern is thr 16/20 hole count. I want to avoid thr zipp stock hubs.

Joined

·
3,213 Posts

Thanks for your feedback, what other hub would you recommend? The WI hubs are easy for me to get my hands on which makes things more convenient.

Joined

·
3,213 Posts

Joined

·
2,714 Posts

I used to think the same until I run the numbers for a build I am involved with; you draw your own conclusions:If you wanted to go with something that's a bit lighter (with wider flange spacing) you could always build up your rims into the Alchemy ELF/ORC UL hubs. Those hubs have wider flange spacing than the T11s, all though they are much more expensive, and not as easy to service. They would build up to be a bit more rigid though.

Alchemy ORC-UL-S11/C11

ds/nds.... Tds...... Tnds..... BAR

3x/3x...... 125...... 58.9..... 2.1

2x/3x...... 125...... 61........2.2...

3x/2x...... 125.......57.6..... 2.1

2x/2x...... 125...... 59.6..... 2.1

WI T-11 S11/C11

ds/nds.... Tds...... Tnds..... BAR

3x/3x...... 125...... 53.4..... 2.3

2x/3x...... 125...... 55.3..... 2.4

3x/2x.......125...... 52.2..... 2.3

Tds and Tnds in kgf; BAR bracing angle ratio nds/ds; the above numbers are for ERD=588 and 32 spokes, bracing angles through spokecalc, hub dimensions from manufacturer website; Tnds is calculated using the flange offset ratio and the spoke length ratio

is it possible to do 2x front with 16h?

Joined

·
3,213 Posts

All in all, the T11s are a much better bang for your buck option.

True and I may get a better deal compared to msrp. Anyone know about 2x lacing 16h front, possible?

Joined

·
2,714 Posts

To the contrary, the T-11 shows better numbers on the stiffness department for this particular case and its doing so at the expense of NDS tension, as expected.

All in all, the T11s are a much better bang for your buck option.

The resulting NDS tension of 53.4 kgf, when the DS tension is at 125 kgf, approaches the low limit of my comfort zone but its quite doable with spokeprep.

The Alchemy shows a lesser degree of stiffness, but still stiff enough for most people, assuming that a bracing angle ratio of around 2 may be the best compromise between stiffness and stability for the average rider. The payback is on the NDS tension where higher values are observed. It could be argued that the Alchemy may be a better rounded hub since it scores points on both the stiffness and stability departments. It may also be a better choice for a lighter rider, especially if his power output is up to moderate levels.

I don't disagree about the value of the T11. As a matter of fact, this would have been my choice for this particular case because I tend to favor stiffness up to the point where a lesser NDS tension is still manageable. The extra $250 in savings is an added incentive, although not my primary consideration; however the point is well taken.

Joined

·
2,714 Posts

I would say no to 2x with 16 spokes. Minimum number of spokes is 18 for 2x lacing.True and I may get a better deal compared to msrp. Anyone know about 2x lacing 16h front, possible?

I run your numbers for the rear wheel using an ERD of 526 and the T-11 hubs you were inquiring about.

For 2x/2x lacing and Tds=125kgf I got a bracing angle ratio of 2.3 and Tnds=53.4 kgf.

Lacing the NDS 3x ups the bracing angle ratio to 2.5 and the Tnds to 56 kgf.

Thanks, so what can i do to maximize stiffness? I plan to use radial lacing, alloy nipples, sapim race spokes with WI hub 16hI would say no to 2x with 16 spokes. Minimum number of spokes is 18 for 2x lacing.

I run your numbers for the rear wheel using an ERD of 526 and the T-11 hubs you were inquiring about.

For 2x/2x lacing and Tds=125kgf I got a bracing angle ratio of 2.3 and Tnds=53.4 kgf.

Lacing the NDS 3x ups the bracing angle ratio to 2.5 and the Tnds to 56 kgf.

Joined

·
2,714 Posts

Wasn't the front wheel stiff enough with the Zipp components? Usually its the rear wheel that suffers.Thanks, so what can i do to maximize stiffness? I plan to use radial lacing, alloy nipples, sapim race spokes with WI hub 16h

The only cross lacing for 16h is 1x. The only sure way I rely on to increase wheel lateral stiffness from the spoke end is to use heavier (stiffer) spokes. Some have also laced 1x with heads-in, however I can not comment because I have never done it.

The question on my mind while I'm typing this is if your weight is appropriate for such low spoke count? If its not, then all of these things are band-aids and the problem will remain uncured.

Read this about rim rubbing and deep profile carbon rims where the hoop is excessively stiff (like the 404 is) and the spoke system is flexy due to type and number of spokes (like the 16 CX-rays) http://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/Debunking_Wheel_Stiffness_3449.html#Scene

I think a lot of the answers you seek are in there.

I weigh about 80-82kg. Regarding spoke choice, I believe I will use Sapim Race spokes since the limited spoke count wont cause weight issues. I just want to rebuild the wheelset and get the most out of them.

Joined

·
2,714 Posts

The author had to replace the wheel with one with 24 spokes for the rubbing to go away. I think you may be borderline with the 20.

Joined

·
2,714 Posts

Disregard my comment on 3x. I had a typo which I have since corrected and I forgot you wanted to stay with 20 spokes. The 2x values I've given you are accurate.Thanks, so what can i do to maximize stiffness? I plan to use radial lacing, alloy nipples, sapim race spokes with WI hub 16h

1 - 15 of 15 Posts

- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.

Join the discussion

Road Bike, Cycling Forums

A forum community dedicated to Road Bike owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Recommended Communities

Join now to ask and comment!