Absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence. To spell it out in gory detail not that it should be necessary, you didn't claim there was no evidence that frame aerodynamics matters; you claimed that is doesn't matter. Surely even you can see the difference.That argument is ridiculous.
Someone made a claim about aerodynamics, and I’m calling it BS based on the fact that there is no good research to justify the claim. So it falls upon me to prove the claim wrong?