[drumbum]

Just picked up the latest issue of Wired and discovered that they had a one page review on a couple cross bikes. Low and behold, Moots came out on top:
http://www.wired.com/reviews/product/moots_psychlox

At first I shrugged off the article as 'yet another review' written by people who know little to nothing about the cycling industry, much less cyclocross, but then did a bit more research. Turns out the author got bit by the cyclocross bug, as evidenced by his blog:
http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/bike_geek/index.html

Which leads me to my next complaint: It looks like the newest trend for journalists is to blog about their transition from office life to serious cycling (*cough* The Climb*cough*)

No hard feelings, just an observation! Happy 4th!

 

[pretender]

Ride more, blog less.

 

[the pope]

Ride more, blog less.

Great advice. Expound on your next, 900th, post.

 

[markmcc]

Hey, I'm actually the author of the reviews, and the blog. And lord knows, I've been bitten by the bug.

Actually raced for years back as a junior, but was away from it for years. CX seems like a great way to scratch that itch, while still dealing with my job and family.

Hope you liked the reviews -- actually had members of Kaiser Permanente/Team Oakland out (my club team) to ride them, so there were more than one of us on all the bikes....

Mark

 

[surfamtn]

I love the range of price points on the bikes tested. Clearly no bias!

 

[dlbcx]

Well, the tentative calendar is up at NCNCA and the first race is on the first weekend of September.

 

[SystemShock]

Great advice. Expound on your next, 900th, post.

...