Road Bike, Cycling Forums banner
21 - 26 of 26 Posts
Discussion starter · #21 ·
brakes

MIRO said:
Thank's a lot for your valuable comments. I do not like Omega brakes, and they ask me $100CDN to upgrade to shimano 105. Is it that much of a difference?
Regards
You're right, the Omega brakes aren't that great, and the 105s are a clear step up. $100cdn sounds about right, since the chances are that the shop won't be able to resell the Omegas, and thus you won't be getting much trade-in value. I'm also assuming they're going to make the swap for you.

One option that might work would be for you to swap out the brake pads for more performance. The Cannondale pads are notoriously wimpy, and just by switching to a pair of higher-quality pads (Koolstop or Shimano 105/Ultegra) you'll see a significant increase in performance. Your shop should be able to do this pretty inexpensively. You could then spring for 105s later in the bike's life. (FYI: 105 calipers are going for $59US at Performance now.)

I've got to admit that I'm not too disappointed in the Omegas, though my expectations were low. Maybe this is because I come from a mountain biking background and have gotten more comfortable with braking in general (it's not a skill that road bikers need to the same degree), but I've just gone with the straight stock setup so far and haven't had too much trouble. Like I said, they're not great, but they're working for me now. I'll probably upgrade the pads soon, but swapping out the calipers is a ways away for me.

Good luck with your choice.
 
I have tried both Trek 2100 and Cannondale R900. I think that Cannondale is bit better for me. Sales representative told me that Cannondale is better for bigger people (I am 220+) and Trek is made to be more European, and made for 150p riders. I think that you mentioned something similar. In addition, I was surprised how easy was going uphill with Cannondale, even though I am not a good rider. There are no hills in the area where I was testing Trek, so I do not know how it behaves under pressure of 220p. Finally, I am thinking to stay on a bike for few hours (~50km) and how important is to have carbon seatstay?

Regards
 
How does it compare to Felt

I was looking at the R700 and the Felt F-70. Do you have any thoughts on those? You get similar components on both, the Felt gives the Shimano 500 wheels instead of the 550 and is all 105, no ultegra rear derailer. But you get the carbon seat stays on the Felt. The price is about the same. Is the carbon rear worth giving up the rear derailer and wheels?
 
Discussion starter · #25 ·
broad generalities, but...

[I actually typed a long response to this a bit ago, but lost it to the server. Here's an abbreviated version.]

...I tend to agree with your LBS salesperson. I tend to (very gently) steer larger gentlemen more toward Cannondales over similarly equiped aluminum bikes in the same price range. (All other things being equal.) While you definitely want vertical compliance, the heavier you are the more this tanslates into flexiness -- a bad thing.

You say there's no hills around where you test the Trek: try standing up and sprinting, as this will roughly approximate the kind of force that you'll be applying to the frame when climbing.

In terms of the carbon seatstays, I think that you really begin to see significant benefits from carbon on longer rides (2+ hrs). Sure, carbon seatstays due dampen larger bumps and make for a discernably smoother ride around the block, but it's on really long rides where the virbration-damping benefits of carbon and its ability to filter out high-frequency vibrations really stand out. If you're planning on doing a lot of long rides (3+ hours weekly and centuries regularly), I think the carbon will really be to your benefit. If you're going to be more shorter rides, with only an occasional epic thrown in (in all honesty, this is the type of riding that most of us do), then it will be less so. For criterium-style races the C'dale will probably serve you in better stead; for centuries and longer road races the Trek makes more sense.

I hope this helps a little. All of it is pretty general (and a couple of days late at that), but I think I'm just reiterating what you probably already knew.

Good luck, and good riding!
 
Discussion starter · #26 ·
Felt v. Dale

I actually have only passing familiarity with Felts. There's no major dealer in my area and I basically know only what I've read on these boards. I've seen one in person (maybe two), but then only briefly, and no rides, so I'm not much help in terms of comparisons.

In terms of your other questions, I wouldn't really worry about the difference between a 105 to an Ultegra derailleur. If you were talking about shifters it would be a different matter, but this small difference in derailleurs (9 speed 105 and 9 speed Ultegra are pretty similar) shouldn't matter too much to you.

The wheels are another matter. While I know that some have faulted the 550s construction in terms of their requiring special tools for servicing, I've found them to be solid, reasonably light hoops. I haven't needed a true yet and that sounds like a pain, but I'm not particularly soft on equipment and I've been pleased with these so far, as have most other reviewers. 500s are still decent wheels, but I'm less impressed with them. They're fine, but they're not nice enough to be used as a selling point, whereas the 550s are one of the things that drew me to the Cannondale. This alone wouldn't make me rule out the Felt, but it is a strike against it.

The question about the carbon seatstays is harder to answer; for my take on carbon seatstays generally see my last post. Here is where you're going to have to spend some time thinking a lot about your particular riding style, body geometry, and riding goals. Carbon is nice, but it can be showy bling as opposed to a bike's asset. Like many people on these boards will say, the construction of the frame and the integration of the carbon stays into the rear triangle make a huge difference in terms of the bikes performance; just slapping carbon in the back isn't always good. (There are a few brands that do this, in my opinion; I don't know enough about Felt to say whether they do or not.)

I guess what I'm saying is that don't immediately assume that the carbon stays necessarily make the Felt a better bike. They may, but they may also turn it into a flexy bike that's only marginally better over bumps. Also, they'll undoubtedly make it heavier than the Cannondale (the bonding of carbon to aluminum adds weight at the joints), but not an enormous amount.

To get a true comparison, see if you can get the LBS to let you swap out wheelsets and ride both bikes with both wheelsets. You'll have to ask nicely and smile pretty, but spending a little time on each bike with each wheelset should allow you to make a well-informed decision.

Good luck either way!
 
21 - 26 of 26 Posts