
I have mixed feelings on a new venge, in some ways a better performing venge would be awesome, but at the same time that means I would want to buy a new one which wouldn't be cheap.I hope it is...so I won't want to get a new one. [emoji12]
I don't think so. The Venge Rim is merely a Venge with hydraulic rim brakes. We will probably see a new Venge in 2016.
Specialized's wind tunnel results say otherwise.And with a rider on the bike, the aero frame advantage becomes all but moot.
It all comes down to a bunch of factors (and we have been over this far too many times). Yes it matters, but not as much as many suggest. The biggest factor in improving aerodynamics on the bike is getting our big noggins down out of the wind. Improved riding position trumps everything else by a long shot. After that, every little bit helps a significant amount when you are riding in a wind tunnel, but guess what folks? We don't ride in wind tunnels. These factors often become less siginifcant when you are riding in a group, covering rough terrain (Roubaix), and climbing up steep hills and mountains, etc. Good lungs, legs, weight, and riding position crush everything else....period. If you already have that, just want to maximize what you have, or love the techie side of cycling, there's nothing wrong with going aero, just keep it in its proper perspective I say. It's not as much about the bike as it is about the rider in the end, so we might as well go for what makes us comfortable and happy. Racers win crits, stages, sprints, and tours all the time on bikes with traditional geometry. Others choose aero bikes as their weapon of choice almost all season long (Kristoff, Degenkolb, etc.). Do you, but know there is no end all be all when it comes to the bike itself (when it comes to geometry, material, gearing, etc.).Specialized's wind tunnel results say otherwise.
you're one of the sanest folks on the forum ... and all this is absoluely true. but I have to say that the difference is noticeable. Not so much because of the frames on aero bikes, but the whole package... if you have a decent aero frame, deep wheels, fairly slick and narrow bars, it adds up to enough to feel as versus a full-on old school frame, particuarly one set up with exterior cables and shallow wheels.It all comes down to a bunch of factors (and we have been over this far too many times). Yes it matters, but not as much as many suggest. The biggest factor in improving aerodynamics on the bike is getting our big noggins down out of the wind. Improved riding position trumps everything else by a long shot. After that, every little bit helps a significant amount when you are riding in a wind tunnel, but guess what folks? We don't ride in wind tunnels. These factors often become less siginifcant when you are riding in a group, covering rough terrain (Roubaix), and climbing up steep hills and mountains, etc. Good lungs, legs, weight, and riding position crush everything else....period. If you already have that, just want to maximize what you have, or love the techie side of cycling, there's nothing wrong with going aero, just keep it in its proper perspective I say. It's not as much about the bike as it is about the rider in the end, so we might as well go for what makes us comfortable and happy. Racers win crits, stages, sprints, and tours all the time on bikes with traditional geometry. Others choose aero bikes as their weapon of choice almost all season long (Kristoff, Degenkolb, etc.). Do you, but know there is no end all be all when it comes to the bike itself (when it comes to geometry, material, gearing, etc.).
I have to agree... I have a Venge and an Allez comp... set up basically the same from a geometry and riding position standpoint. The Venge is on 50mm carbon wheels and the Allez is actually on 60mm carbon wheels. The Venge definitely goes faster down the same set of downhill sections.you're one of the sanest folks on the forum ... and all this is absoluely true. but I have to say that the difference is noticeable. Not so much because of the frames on aero bikes, but the whole package... if you have a decent aero frame, deep wheels, fairly slick and narrow bars, it adds up to enough to feel as versus a full-on old school frame, particuarly one set up with exterior cables and shallow wheels.
I run one of each, and the standard frame setup is clearly draggy in high speed pulls and coasting tests (2-3 mph) down major hills at terminal velocity.
But i agree with what youre saying.
Yeah, I have to keep my fat noggin down low in either case. And for example if it was just the S5 frame versus tarmac sl2 or sl3, on the same bars and wheels I wouldnt be able to tell the differences, except in harsher ride quality.
I live in the bay area and I saw what I think was Chris D'Aluisio riding an unmarked black bike a few weeks ago in Santa Cruz. I was in a car on a backroad, and saw him stop at a stop sign, before coming past my car. I am thinking this could have been the venge but I guess we will find out soon. I didn't get a great look at it, all I noticed was that the downtube had an interesting or weird cutout in it, almost like a Wilier cento crono. Can't wait to see what the next gen looks like.I'm 100% certain we'll see a new "aero" frame from Specialized at the Tour.
Oh... yes, driving around looking for people on bikes before the sun comes up cn give a lot of clues.I live in the bay area and I saw what I think was Chris D'Aluisio riding an unmarked black bike a few weeks ago in Santa Cruz. I was in a car on a backroad, and saw him stop at a stop sign, before coming past my car. I am thinking this could have been the venge but I guess we will find out soon. I didn't get a great look at it, all I noticed was that the downtube had an interesting or weird cutout in it, almost like a Wilier cento crono. Can't wait to see what the next gen looks like.