rx-79g said:
Looking at the current geometry charts (which don't usually change much year to year), the difference between the uni and women's Synapse are minimal. For the "54" size, the uni has a 54 TT and the women's is 53. If anything, I like some of the women's version numbers better.
I would love to see a reference to this "different tubing" theory. Most bikes don't use different tubing across the full size range, let alone the uni vs. women's.
Why is it so hard to believe that manufacturer's use different tubing on women's bikes? They advertise they do, anyway.
From Felt: (clicked on Fit Woman on their website):
"...This isn’t just a repurposed men’s bike—the ZW4, built with Felt’s FitWoman geometry, is custom designed to meet the specific needs of women athletes.
Smaller-diameter carbon fiber tubes, a shorter cockpit to accommodate female proportions..." They also claim the woman's alloy bikes are custom-butted, so different from the men's.
Felt isn't the only one to say they use different tubesets on women's bike, but I'm not going to make an exhaustive list of who does and doesn't. Not all manufacturers use different tubing on woman's frames, but many do. FWIW, I can remember just a few years ago some of the major manufacturers didn't even change geos - they simply threw on a women's saddle and a shorter stem and called it "women's." But nowadays, most of them make the women's bikes with at least different geos, and many with tubesets or carbon layups that are different than the men's.
And Touch...I'm sure you can ride a woman's frame, even it has a different tubing, if the geo is good for you. It wouldn't likely fall apart or anything, but they do apparently design them with the idea that weight and likely power will be distributed slightly differently due to the differences in men's and women's physiques.