What are the pros and cons?
Thanks
Thanks
So why on earth would you bend it? Looks? Shock absorbsion? I would only guess the later would be a reasonable explanation for the curve. Maybe it's just a learning curve.HMBAtrail said:Variety is the spice of life. Some like it one way while others like at another. Ain't life grand?
But, yes it is easier to build a straight bladed fork simply because you don't have to go through the process of bending the blades. But, the additional work is minor.
Where did you find that story about Colnago? I'd like to read that.paredown said:Couple of points--it seems that if Ernesto is telling the story at all accurately, he came up with the design for the Precisa straight bladed fork because he was challenged by the Ferrari materials guys who asked point blank, "Why do you bend the forks?" E answers "for handling/damping." "Let's test" said the Ferrari guys.
And they found no significant improvement with traditional curved forks vs a straight fork bent at the crown and the latter had advantages (stronger because of no residual stress from cold bending). And the Precisa was the result.
But I think for a lot of years, conventional wisdom was that you had to curve the fork blades for ride comfort.
Second point is where the stress is--wasn't it Ritchey who first made a headset with a larger bottom frame cup precisely because it carried more stress?
Okay so let me ask you this...BentChainring said:If it has offset, then yes.
There is no reason you are required to have fork offset.
Yes I agree. I think I'll leave the intended fork. You're right.ultimobici said:Your Casati's fork is period right for an mid 90's Italian frame. The Soma is quite likely designed with their frame's geometry in mind hence the 41mm rake. Build the frame up with the intended fork and at least see how it rides as Casati intended. Then look at replacing the forks. By bolting a different fork into it you'll possibly kill the handling and ride characteristics. Casati have probably forgotten more about frame building than Soma know too!
After receiving the frame-set I would never break this up. I didn't think it was going to be this nice. I'm actually blown away because it looks ten times better in person. As good as any De Rosa or Cinelli I've seen and that's saying a bit. The paint and chrome looks better than my Tecno too. I really didn't think the paint and chrome looked as good as I expected on my Tecno though considering the price of that frame set. This thing was an absolute bargain at $550. The fork looks pretty good to me now. An engraved crown would be sweet but it is what it is and I'm more than satisfied. I can't wait to ride this thing. I checked the STA (73.5) and HTA (73) with one of my machinist protractors from work and it's exactly what I was looking for too. I looked for the angles everywhere on the web but only found some angles from other Casati frames and they weren’t exactly what I would have liked but this frame is more standard it seems which is good. Shame on me for wanting to put a Soma fork with this frame. Wow!ultimobici said:Your Casati's fork is period right for an mid 90's Italian frame. The Soma is quite likely designed with their frame's geometry in mind hence the 41mm rake. Build the frame up with the intended fork and at least see how it rides as Casati intended. Then look at replacing the forks. By bolting a different fork into it you'll possibly kill the handling and ride characteristics. Casati have probably forgotten more about frame building than Soma know too!